Skip to main content

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit News: Carey Danis & Lowe Remarks on West Virginia Vaginal Mesh MDLs Complaint Form Update

transvaginal_mesh_implants_lawsuit_litigation_settlements_obtapeAs the parties involved in the five vaginal mesh multidistrict litigation (MDL) cases recently met about removing certain entities from plaintiffs’ cases, the court has followed through on the name removal agreement with its revised complaint forms. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia recently filed a revised short form complaint and an amended short form complaint for plaintiffs who are filing a new vaginal mesh lawsuit or updating their case in their respective MDL.

The update to complaint forms is detailed in pretrial order number fifty. According to Carey Danis & Lowe vaginal mesh lawyers, modifying the complaint forms to reflect the removal of Endo and Coloplast entities will significantly assist plaintiffs who are currently filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit against one of the five medical device manufacturers. The update ensures that plaintiffs and their legal counsel will use the correct nomenclature when referencing a manufacturer in future complaint forms, and thus, lead to a more efficient legal process.

The five West Virginia transvaginal mesh MDLs are being presided over by U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. The cases are In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2327; In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2187; In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2325; In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2326; and In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2387.

Carey Danis & Lowe vaginal mesh lawyers hear from women every day about injuries allegedly linked to the use of a vaginal mesh product, such as the Ethicon Gynecare Prolift. Along with the Gynecare Prolift, vaginal mesh lawyers at Carey Danis & Lowe continue to investigate what injured parties claim is the defective nature of the Gynecare Prolift and other vaginal mesh products.

Women who have filed vaginal mesh lawsuits have claimed injury from vaginal mesh erosion, vaginal mesh contraction, infection, and severe pelvic pain. Quite often, women have had to undergo numerous surgeries to remove and repair the damage caused by transvaginal mesh, and in some cases, the damage cannot be easily fixed.

If you or someone you love has been injured by a transvaginal mesh product, contact an experienced transvaginal mesh lawyer at Carey Danis & Lowe. Our lawyers will help you understand your legal options, provide you with a free legal evaluation, and can assist in filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit.

Contact Carey Danis & Lowe today by calling 800.721.2519 or by submitting a personal injury claim form.